Introduction
Owing to the large-scale burning of fossil fuels to produce energy, greenhouse gas emissions have increased alarmingly. Reducing these emissions has become a common concern. Hydrogen energy, a new and renewable energy source, is being actively used nowadays in hydrogen cars and various other means of transportation, such as ships, trains, and airplanes [1]. It has the potential to be applied as a key energy source in the carbon-neutral era. However, owing to the current hydrogen production methods, hydrogen energy has been criticized for not being a clean energy source. According to the report ‘The Future of Hydrogen’ published by the International Energy Agency (IEA) [2], 76% of the world’s 70 million tons of hydrogen production is currently extracted from natural gas and the remaining 23% from coal. Approximately 830 million tons of carbon dioxide are generated annually, and less than 0.1% of the world's hydrogen production is green hydrogen. Therefore, to use hydrogen as a clean energy source, the proportion of green hydrogen production must increase. Water electrolysis technology, which produces hydrogen by electrolyzing water and is a method of producing green hydrogen, is actively being researched for various applications, such as electrodes, catalysts, separators, electrolytes, and electrolytic cells (reactors). The water electrolysis oxygen evolution reaction (OER) under alkaline conditions starts with the adsorption of abundant OH- ions on the catalyst surface (or O vacancy site) (1) as follows [3]: * + OH− →*OH + e- (1), *OH →*O + H+ + e− (2), *O + OH− →*OOH + e− (3), *OOH →* + O2 + H+ + e− (4) (where * represents a catalyst adsorption (or active) site). The adsorbed *OH undergoes oxidative deprotonation to form *O (2). Then, *O reacts with other OH- to form *OOH intermediate (3), and in the last step, *OOH is deprotonated to regenerate the active site, and O2 is generated (4). The OER is the most important process in water electrolysis, involving the generation of four electrons, and occurs more slowly than the hydrogen generation reaction (HER). The main intermediates observed in the OER are HO⁎, O⁎, and HOO⁎, and in the OER reaction, the binding interaction with MO on the catalyst surface plays an important role in stabilizing these reaction intermediates, which eventually has a significant effect on the overall water splitting efficiency [4]. Because the fundamental overpotential of the reaction can be overcome by stabilizing HOO⁎ on the catalyst surface [5], developing an OER catalyst that lowers the overpotential in water electrolysis is crucial.
Metal oxide catalysts, such as RuO2, IrO2, metal oxides, and oxyhydroxides, are the commonly used electrocatalysts in an OER [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. However, noble metals, such as Ir, Ru, IrO2, and RuO2, which are widely used as state-of-the-art catalysts in OER processes to increase energy conversion efficiency, cannot be mass-produced owing to their scarcity, high cost, and poor durability. Therefore, it is important to explore noble metal-free catalysts that promote kinetically slow OER. Contrarily, oxides or layered hydroxides (CoOOH, FeOOH, or NiOOH) containing transition metal elements, such as Co, Ni, and Fe, have relatively stable activities, and they have been widely studied as OER catalysts [11], [12], [13]. Furthermore, they are abundant, inexpensive, and environmentally friendly; and because they exhibit semiconductor characteristics, they have the advantage of enhancing OER activity by promoting charge transfer when grafted with other conductive materials [14]. In general, two main strategies are used to continuously improve the electrocatalytic activity: “active site maximization and conductivity optimization” [15]. First, to maximize the density of active sites, the catalyst crystal size, shape, intrinsic lattice defects, and crystal phase must be well controlled [16]. Recently, studies on spinel-type metal oxide nanostructure designs with a large surface area and many active sites have been reported. In particular, mixed transition metal oxides, which have typical spinel structures, are more valuable as OER electrode catalysts than single transition metal oxides [17]. For example, the synthesis of multi-layered oxygen vacancy-rich NiCo2O4 spinel nanosheets has been reported [18], [19], where it was revealed that oxygen vacancies trapped in ultrathin nanosheets can lower the H2O adsorption energy and increase the OER efficiency.
This study attempts to optimize the OER by inducing lattice defects and maximizing OH− ion adsorption on the crystal surface by adding Al to the ZnFe2O4 spinel structure, which is composed of transition metals that are cheaper than Ni or Co. In general, because the OER catalyst needs to oxidize the adsorbed OH− to O2, the catalyst itself needs to undergo significant reduction. Additionally, because the electrons generated at this time must be well passed to the external circuit, it should also be able to self-oxidize. That is, the catalyst must have a reducing component that attracts electrons well and an oxidizing component that provides electrons well, simultaneously. Therefore, the catalyst in this study was composed of bi-metals, using Fe3+ as the reducing metal and Zn2+ as the oxidizing metal. To induce an advantage owing to the oxygen defects, the crystal was formed into a spinel structure. Furthermore, to maximize the adsorption of OH−, the catalyst surface was acidic, and Al3+ ions were partially substituted into the framework. Finally, we attempted to determine the effect of lattice defects and OH− adsorption capacity of the designed catalyst surface on the OER performance through various analyses.
Section snippets
Preparation of electrocatalysts
The ZnFe2O4 (ZFO) particle was prepared through the process presented in Scheme S1a in the supplementary material. To 500 mL of deionized water, 0.1M zinc sulfate heptahydrate (ZnSO4∙7H2O, ≥99%, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and 0.2M iron sulfate heptahydrate (FeSO4∙7H2O, ≥99%, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) were added and stirred for 1 h. To this solution, 28–30% ammonia water (NH4OH, Daejung Chemicals & Metals Co. Ltd, Korea) was slowly added until the pH reached 10, followed by stirring for 12 h to make a
Physical properties
Figs. 1a and S1 show the XRD patterns of the NF electrodes coated with ZFAO particles and powders, respectively. Diffraction peaks of pure ZFO powder appeared at 2θ = 18.8°, 30.4°, 35.8°, 43.5°, 53.8°, 57.5°, 63.1°, and 73.9°, which are the (111), (220), (311), (400), (422), (511), (440), and (533) planes attributed to the spinel cubic crystal structure (space group: Fd-3m, JCPDS 82-1042), respectively [22]. No phases for other impurities were detected. As Al3+ substitution increased, the peaks
Conclusions
This study aimed to develop an inexpensive and high-performance OER electrode without using expensive transition metals such as Ni or Co. Five types of electrodes were fabricated with a mixed spinel structure, the Al-substituted ZnFe2-xAlxO4/NF, which was loaded on the NF support. Raman spectra revealed that the fabricated electrocatalysts were a mixed phase of normal and inverse spinels. It was confirmed that the substituted Al occupied the tetrahedral and octahedral sites evenly in an almost
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Hojun Moon: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft. Namgyu Son: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft. Myeong Seok Goh: Investigation, Visualization, Software. Taeho Yoon: Formal analysis, Data curation. Joonwoo Kim: Investigation, Visualization, Software. Chunli Liu: Formal analysis, Data curation. Younghwan Im: Methodology, Writing – review & editing, Investigation. Seog Joon Yoon: Methodology, Writing – review & editing, Investigation. Misook Kang:
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea grants funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. 2022R1A2C2008313) for which the authors are very grateful.
© 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.